THE CRUX OF IT: Hillary is not the person most perceive her to be.
Let it not be said in this year’s election cycle, that opposition is reserved exclusively and entirely for the Simeon Super-villain on the right wing.
No, the so-called left has a candidate that is extremely qualified – TO OPPOSE!
Yeah- obviously I mean you Hillary!
The reasons to refuse support for this person are varied and numerous. I will attempt to be succinct yet thorough in listing her many detrimental attributes and liabilities. The one unifying assertion is that Clinton is opportunistic and duplicitous. She is not the person she portrays herself to be.
*Clinton began as the president of her Young Republicans Club in High School
*She was a so-called “Goldwater Girl“– Barry Goldwater was a conservative that believed in the limiting of Federal Governments interference in State’s affairs. That viewpoint led to his opposing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Clinton stayed with his organization until 1968.
*Crime bill — She lobbied congress in 1994 on behalf of then President Clinton’s crime bill. That bill has proven to be an extremely biased and deleterious piece of legislation- the legacy of it being primarily mass incarceration.
* “Super Predators” — She blithely spouted out this term as a thinly veiled euphemism for black people.
* Iraqi War — Her support for this falsified act of aggression is well documented.
* Henry Kissinger — She relied heavily on the judgement and appraisals of Nixon’s former Sec. of State- a man that many consider to be a war criminal ( although he has never been brought up on any charges at all).
* Robert Kagan , co-creator of the Project for a New American Century has endorsed her– He is a Neocon and a pro-interventionist- meaning he believes in an aggressive regime-change strategy. This points to the unfettered hawkishness that conflicts with this so-called progressive image that this career politician has worked so hard to cultivate.
* Iran — She has continually been over aggressive and overcompensating with the intent to seem powerful by using hawkish threats such as ” We will obliterate Iran…”
* Her campaign is largely financed by every group that liberals despise.
Abby Martin has produced a definitive piece on the egregious candidate and her questionable history.
Please Watch:
Clinton had 700 super delegates , one third of all need to secure the nomination, pledged to her from the start of the campaign. Was there any way that this woman was not going to get the nomination ( especially after it was “stolen” from her in 2008)?