THE CRUX OF IT: He may end up being a witless doorman for the radical right-wing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“I have a great relationship with – the blacks.”

“Look at-my– African American…”

“…They’re bringing drugs…They’re rapists and …I assume some of them are good people…”

“…Are you saying that we don’t have a Muslim problem?”

“…The concept of Global Warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make US manufacturing non-competitive.”

Anyone that supports the Republican candidate Drumpf must also take time to consider this point; Even if he could possibly be a non-racist and benevolent public servant, too many of his followers are not.

If he were to be elected, the acolytes that rally behind him would undoubtedly be emboldened. Too many of them are a potential and material threat.

Don’t believe me?

The list begins with William Johnson, a prominent white nationalist delegate for him.

The list continues with David Riden. Riden was a delegate candidate on the Tennessee ballot last December and will represent Drumpf in Califonia at the Republican National Convention. Seven years ago in Illinois he attended the so-called “Continental Congress of 2009,” where he and other delegates put forth “Articles of Freedom” that called for abolishing all federal firearms laws, replacing the Department of Homeland Security with citizen militias, and, if necessary, launching an insurrection against the federal government. This man disclosed to Mother Jones that American leaders that “violate” the Constitution may have to be killed.

Let’s continue with David Duke, former KKK grand wizard.

Again, let me make the point clear; Although Drumpf may or may not have denounced some of these examples, there are others that he has not. They still represent his interests and he theirs.

His potential election would solidify the resolve of the portion of the country that is most prone to act radically. That word is not only reserved for the fringe religious overseas. It can be applied to many here at home that would promise you their beliefs are wholesome and pious and without bigotry.

What if those with a similar mindset unified and began pulling strings?

What if the “Man of the People” felt that their will was rightfully expressed and  justified and remained passive when unrest began? What if he instigated it?

Don’t think that would occur?

Go back and watch his rallies-listen to the multiple encouragements of physical violence.

Even if he would not initiate the harm, there is no reason to believe that he would do anything whatsoever to either prevent it, defend against it, or prosecute anyone for it.